Cursor vs Windsurf

A side-by-side look at Cursor and Windsurf — pricing, features and where each one wins. Both are reviewed independently on Curata AI.

CursorWindsurf
SummaryAI-native code editor built on VS Code with agent workflows.AI IDE from Codeium focused on autonomous agent workflows.
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryCodingCoding
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxmacOS, Windows, Linux
Key features
  • Composer
  • Agent
  • Tab Autocomplete
  • Codebase Chat
  • Model Choice
  • Cascade Agent
  • Codebase Awareness
  • Free Tier
  • VS Code Compatible
Pros
  • Very fast
  • Excellent agent mode
  • Works with all major models
  • VS Code compatible
  • Ships improvements weekly
  • Strong agent mode
  • Generous free tier
  • Fast improvements
Cons
  • Paid plan needed for heavy use
  • Requests can get expensive
  • Smaller ecosystem than Cursor
  • Agents still need review

Read the full Cursor review

Cursor is the AI-first code editor that many senior engineers have quietly switched to. It forks VS Code, adds deep repo understanding, Composer for multi-file edits and background agents that can plan and execute changes on their own. The Tab autocomplete alone is worth the switch. Cursor works with every major model and lets you pick per-request. If you write code for a living, this is the tool most likely to change how you work.

Read the full Windsurf review

Windsurf (by Codeium) is a direct Cursor competitor that leans hard into agentic, long-running tasks. Its Cascade agent can plan and execute across many files with minimal hand-holding. Pricing is aggressive and there is a genuinely useful free tier. If Cursor feels too hands-on, Windsurf is worth trying.