Windsurf vs Cursor

A side-by-side look at Windsurf and Cursor — pricing, features and where each one wins. Both are reviewed independently on Curata AI.

WindsurfCursor
SummaryAI IDE from Codeium focused on autonomous agent workflows.AI-native code editor built on VS Code with agent workflows.
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryCodingCoding
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxmacOS, Windows, Linux
Key features
  • Cascade Agent
  • Codebase Awareness
  • Free Tier
  • VS Code Compatible
  • Composer
  • Agent
  • Tab Autocomplete
  • Codebase Chat
  • Model Choice
Pros
  • Strong agent mode
  • Generous free tier
  • Fast improvements
  • Very fast
  • Excellent agent mode
  • Works with all major models
  • VS Code compatible
  • Ships improvements weekly
Cons
  • Smaller ecosystem than Cursor
  • Agents still need review
  • Paid plan needed for heavy use
  • Requests can get expensive

Read the full Windsurf review

Windsurf (by Codeium) is a direct Cursor competitor that leans hard into agentic, long-running tasks. Its Cascade agent can plan and execute across many files with minimal hand-holding. Pricing is aggressive and there is a genuinely useful free tier. If Cursor feels too hands-on, Windsurf is worth trying.

Read the full Cursor review

Cursor is the AI-first code editor that many senior engineers have quietly switched to. It forks VS Code, adds deep repo understanding, Composer for multi-file edits and background agents that can plan and execute changes on their own. The Tab autocomplete alone is worth the switch. Cursor works with every major model and lets you pick per-request. If you write code for a living, this is the tool most likely to change how you work.