Which is better, Make or n8n?

Make suits users who value visual builder makes complex branching logic genuinely readable, not just a chain of linear steps, while n8n is preferred when self-hostable matter most. Pick based on your primary workflow.

Is Make or n8n cheaper?

Make is freemium, n8n is open source. Check each official site for current tiers.

Make vs n8n

A side-by-side look at Make and n8n — pricing, features and where each one wins. Both are reviewed independently on Curata AI.

	Make	n8n
Summary	Visual AI automation platform for building workflows and AI agents across 3,000+ connected apps.	Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI nodes.
Pricing	Freemium	Open Source
Category	Automation	Automation
Platforms	Web	Web, Self-hosted
Key features	Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop) AI Agents & Prompt-Based Building 3,000+ App Integrations Routers & Complex Branching Logic Custom Variables & Full-Text Log Search Enterprise Governance (SSO, SOC 2/3)	400+ Integrations AI Agent Nodes Self-Hosting Code Nodes Webhooks
Pros	Visual builder makes complex branching logic genuinely readable, not just a chain of linear steps 3,000+ app integrations cover most real-world automation needs out of the box AI Agents extend Make beyond point-to-point triggers into multi-step, AI-orchestrated processes Real free tier (1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios) makes it easy to validate before paying Enterprise-ready governance (SSO, SOC 2/3) supports larger, regulated organizations	Self-hostable Powerful AI nodes Fair-code license Great community
Cons	Pricing is credit-based, so heavier or more complex scenarios can consume a monthly allowance faster than a simple task count suggests Steeper learning curve than a purely linear automation tool once scenarios use routers and complex branching The Free plan's 2-scenario cap and 15-minute run interval are restrictive for anything beyond testing Some advanced features (custom functions, full enterprise app integrations) are reserved for the Enterprise tier	Steeper learning curve than Zapier Self-hosting requires ops effort

Which one should you choose?

Make

Best for: Operations, IT and RevOps teams who need Zapier-level polish with n8n-level flexibility for complex, branching automations.

🚀 Try Make Free

n8n

Best for: Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI nodes.

Visit Official Website ↗

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, CurataHub may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products we genuinely believe are valuable.

Read the full Make review

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual AI automation platform for building and managing automations and AI agents — visually with its drag-and-drop scenario builder, in code, or from a prompt. It sits between Zapier's simplicity and n8n's raw power: complex branching, routers, data manipulation and AI modules are all first-class, with 3,000+ pre-built app integrations covering everything from Slack to Salesforce. Beyond point-to-point automation, Make's AI Agents let teams orchestrate multi-step, AI-driven processes across their stack, with an execution log, custom variables and enterprise governance (SSO, SOC 2/3) available on higher tiers. Pricing runs on a monthly operations credit allowance rather than a flat per-zap fee, scaling from a real free tier through Core, Pro, Teams and a custom Enterprise plan.

Make review →Make alternatives →

Read the full n8n review

n8n is a fair-code workflow automation platform that has become the default choice for building AI agents and RAG pipelines you actually control. Its AI nodes, code steps and 400+ integrations let you wire together LLMs, vector stores and business apps without vendor lock-in. Self-hostable, extensible and used seriously in production.

n8n review →n8n alternatives →