Make vs Zapier AI
A side-by-side look at Make and Zapier AI — pricing, features and where each one wins. Both are reviewed independently on Curata AI.
| Make | Zapier AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Visual AI automation platform for building workflows and AI agents across 3,000+ connected apps. | The most popular no-code automation platform, now with AI actions and agents. |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Key features |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Which one should you choose?
Make
Best for: Operations, IT and RevOps teams who need Zapier-level polish with n8n-level flexibility for complex, branching automations.
Zapier AI
Best for: The most popular no-code automation platform, now with AI actions and agents.
Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, CurataHub may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products we genuinely believe are valuable.
Read the full Make review
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual AI automation platform for building and managing automations and AI agents — visually with its drag-and-drop scenario builder, in code, or from a prompt. It sits between Zapier's simplicity and n8n's raw power: complex branching, routers, data manipulation and AI modules are all first-class, with 3,000+ pre-built app integrations covering everything from Slack to Salesforce. Beyond point-to-point automation, Make's AI Agents let teams orchestrate multi-step, AI-driven processes across their stack, with an execution log, custom variables and enterprise governance (SSO, SOC 2/3) available on higher tiers. Pricing runs on a monthly operations credit allowance rather than a flat per-zap fee, scaling from a real free tier through Core, Pro, Teams and a custom Enterprise plan.
Read the full Zapier AI review
Zapier remains the reference no-code automation tool with the largest integration catalog. AI Actions let non-technical users drop LLM steps into any workflow, and Zapier Agents turn plain-language descriptions into working automations. Best when integration breadth matters more than deep customization.